TOWN MEETINGS has its genealogy in past regular GDR events from 2009–2010. These include Home Cinema, where the screening of films that touch upon different aspects of domesticity, neighbourhood organisation, urban planning and alternative politics, take place; Thursday Night Supper, occasions for cooking, eating and discussion with various guests, and the midterm manifestation GDR GOES ON which consisted of a series of events over four days in domestic, private, and public spaces in Utrecht.
Ruth Buchanan and Andreas Müller
Casco, Volksbuurt Museum and Rooie Rat
For the exhibition design, artist Ruth Buchanan and architect Andreas Müller focuses on the Casco space to transform it in the way of actualising the domestic sphere as a space that can offer other modalities of being such as openness, vulnerability and generosity and therefore actively reinterpreting its social and political potential. For them, the key is its singularlisation, distanced from the demands of networked living and the ubiquity of IKEA culture, as yet, to be distinguished from the individualistic. In doing so, they also removed part of Casco’s ‘Shack and Fence’ spatial structure to become the material structure of the ‘18B Pavilion’.
spatial design views of Casco below









For the Volksbuurt Museum and Rooie Rat bookstore, a more subtle system was suggested: ifau & Jesko Fezer’s ‘Many Furniture’ items leftover from the GDR apartment, are now painted sky blue, the code for ‘publicity’ (see original colour key on reverse side), and used to signal the cohabitation of our exhibition works among the existing items in these extended venues.
GDR Diary 5: Reading Perec
Following Sepake’s suggestion, on my last day at the apartment I read the beginning of Georges Perec’s Life A User’s Manual (2008, [1978]) to the plants.
It starts with

and then continues:
"To begin with, the art of jigsaw puzzles seems of little substance, easily exhausted, wholly dealt with by a basic introduction to Gestalt: the perceived object — we may be dealing with a perceptual act, the acquisition of a skill, a physiological system, or, as in the present case, a wooden jigsaw puzzle — is not a sum of elements to be distinguished from each other and analysed discretely, but a pattern, that is to say a form, a structure: the element’s existence does not precede the existence of the whole, it comes neither before not after it, for he parts do not determine the pattern, but the pattern determines the parts: knowledge of the pattern and of its laws, of the set and its structure, could not be possible derived from discrete knowledge of the elements that compose it."
[Here I started thinking about the domestic space as multilayered, open and in continuous flux.]
"That means that you can look at a piece of a puzzle for three whole days, you can believe that you know all there is to know about its colouring and shape, and be no further on than when you started. The only thing that counts is the ability to link this piece to other pieces, and in that sense the art of the jigsaw puzzle has something in common with the art of go. The pieces are readable, take on a sense, only when assembled; in isolation, a puzzle piece means nothing — just an impossible question, an opaque challenge."
[And at this point I started thinking about the GDR itself as an assemblage. The GDR as a project that is itself composed of individual projects, pieces, events and encounters that share transversal concerns that are not necessarily inscribed into a set of harmonious assumptions. For example, Mirjam Thomann's reflection on space through the installation of the Two Part Door is radically different from Martha Rosler's archival project on If You Lived Here... as a reflection on the contemporary relevance and possibilities of the engagement of art with community activism focused in the issues of housing, gentrification and displacement.]
"But as soon as you have succeeded, after minutes of trial and error, or after a prodigious half-second flash of inspiration, in fitting it into one of its neighbours, the piece disappears, ceases to exist as a piece."
[The inexistence of an overarching framework of interpretation of the project is directly related to its definition as an exploratory reflection on spatiality as a condition to individual action and artistic engagement, here analysed through a focus on the domestic space. And in this direction, perhaps what matters the most is not the possible similarities that are to be identified among the individual projects but, on the contrary, the potential that is presented by the GDR to articulate the fundamental relationship between the multilayered depth of space and the agonistic character of the artistic-design interventions that can be developed with it in mind.]
"The intense difficulty preceding this link-up – which the English word puzzle indicates so well – not only loses its raison d’être, it seems never to have had any reason, so obvious does the solution appear. The new pieces so miraculously conjoined are henceforth one, which in its turn will be a source of error, hesitation, dismay, and expectation. (…)"
[Yes, I had managed to grasp something. And then I read a little longer ---this time in silence --- to myself.]
25 May 2010, 23.37 — posted by Mafalda
Edit